{"id":1450,"date":"2023-05-15T14:41:54","date_gmt":"2023-05-15T14:41:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/?p=1450"},"modified":"2023-05-16T07:38:49","modified_gmt":"2023-05-16T07:38:49","slug":"issue-of-full-and-final-settlement-of-dispute-is-a-question-of-fact-which-has-to-be-decided-by-the-arbitrator-delhi-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/?p=1450","title":{"rendered":"Issue Of Full And Final Settlement Of Dispute Is A Question Of Fact Which Has To Be Decided By The Arbitrator: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Delhi High Court has held that an issue of full and final settlement of dispute between the parties will be a question of fact which has to be decided by the arbitrator. The bench of Justice Navin Chawla held that the Court while exercising powers under Section 11 of the A&amp;C Act cannot determine a disputed question of fact as its jurisdiction is confined to a prima&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Delhi High Court has held that an issue of full and final settlement of dispute between the parties will<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-high-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1450"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1450\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1452,"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1450\/revisions\/1452"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawoftodaynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}